ABSTRACT
The outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) following the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral infection has placed particular pressure on occidental health systems, especially in terms of acute care resources and critical care skills. A number of affected patients subsequently required a rehabilitation process, due to multiple functional limitations, either as a result of an extended stay in intensive care or the consequences of the infection itself. The aim of this article is to report on the Geneva experience in post COVID19 rehabilitation, through 2 clinical vignettes, illustrating the heterogeneity of symptoms and deficits that may be encountered following this disease.Copyright © 2020 Editions Medecine et Hygiene. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) following the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral infection has placed particular pressure on occidental health systems, especially in terms of acute care resources and critical care skills. A number of affected patients subsequently required a rehabilitation process, due to multiple functional limitations, either as a result of an extended stay in intensive care or the consequences of the infection itself. The aim of this article is to report on the Geneva experience in post COVID19 rehabilitation, through 2 clinical vignettes, illustrating the heterogeneity of symptoms and deficits that may be encountered following this disease.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nosocomial outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are frequent despite implementation of conventional infection control measures. An outbreak investigation was undertaken using advanced genomic and statistical techniques to reconstruct likely transmission chains and assess the role of healthcare workers (HCWs) in SARS-CoV-2 transmission. METHODS: A nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in a university-affiliated rehabilitation clinic was investigated, involving patients and HCWs, with high coverage of pathogen whole-genome sequences (WGS). The time-varying reproduction number from epidemiological data (Rt) was estimated, and maximum likelihood phylogeny was used to assess genetic diversity of the pathogen. Genomic and epidemiological data were combined into a Bayesian framework to model the directionality of transmission, and a case-control study was performed to investigate risk factors for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 acquisition in patients. FINDINGS: The outbreak lasted from 14th March to 12th April 2020, and involved 37 patients (31 with WGS) and 39 employees (31 with WGS), 37 of whom were HCWs. Peak Rt was estimated to be between 2.2 and 3.6. The phylogenetic tree showed very limited genetic diversity, with 60 of 62 (96.7%) isolates forming one large cluster of identical genomes. Despite the resulting uncertainty in reconstructed transmission events, the analyses suggest that HCWs (one of whom was the index case) played an essential role in cross-transmission, with a significantly greater fraction of infections (P<2.2e-16) attributable to HCWs (70.7%) than expected given the number of HCW cases (46.7%). The excess of transmission from HCWs was higher when considering infection of patients [79.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 78.5-79.5%] and frail patients (Clinical Frailty Scale score >5; 82.3%; 95% CI 81.8-83.4%). Furthermore, frail patients were found to be at greater risk for nosocomial COVID-19 than other patients (adjusted odds ratio 6.94, 95% CI 2.13-22.57). INTERPRETATION: This outbreak report highlights the essential role of HCWs in SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in healthcare settings. Limited genetic diversity in pathogen genomes hampered the reconstruction of individual transmission events, resulting in substantial uncertainty in who infected whom. However, this study shows that despite such uncertainty, significant transmission patterns can be observed.